Monday, October 25, 2010

Hedging in Data Commentaries

Dear Professor,

     Hello. I collect the data related to Regular exam and Makeup exam in your introductory biology course and speculate the reason why there is a big discrepancy between these two exams.
     At first, I will explain the data. These two exams were held in different settings, such as time, number of students, proctors, board examples and room environments, although the difficulty of questions are completely same. Regular exam was enrolled by a five-sixth students (125), and held on Wednesday night with professor’s proctor and the board examples. Also, the exam room temperature was about 20C. On the other hand, Makeup exam was enrolled by a one-sixth students (25), and held on Friday afternoon with the teaching assistant’s proctor. The board examples were not offered in Makeup exam. Also, the exam room temperature was about 28C. To summarize, Regular exam was held with the professors’s proctor and the board examples under the room temperature 20C, although Makeup exam was held with the TA’s proctor and no board examples under the room temperature 28C. Regarding the average score, the average score of Regular exam is higher than that of Makeup exam (86 vs 72/100).
     I would now like to explain prospective reasons for this big discrepancy between two exams. In my opinion, there are three reasons for this. First, board examples in Regular exam might help the students understand the meaning of some questions precisely. Second, the difference of the room temperature. The temperature of Makeup exam(28C) seems to be uncomfortable environment for most students. Third, the difference of the proctor might affect the student’s power of concentration.  Regular exam’s high average score might be caused by these three reasons. However, I did not look into each student’s characteristics between two exams. Thus, I cannot mentioned about the effects of students’ characteristics on these exam scores.  

Sincerely,
Tomoko SUWA

Monday, October 18, 2010

DC metro use

     DC metro use is fluctuated during day, especially each hour. There are two spikes in 8:00 and 18:00 while three dips in 6:00, 16:00 and 20:00. The number of people who use DC metro rises significantly to around 400, reaching the highest point during day shortly after 8:00. On the other hand, the number of people who use DC metro declines to less than 100, reaching the lowest point during day shortly after16:00. These fluctuations seem to be caused mainly by the office workers because the time of two spikes is correlated with opening and closing time of the general office.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Method

     I studied whether the "prevailing myths" that Chinese communities would always look after their elderly was true in the U.S. in this research by the interview. I picked up the ten interviewees, who were my friends or friends of friends, from the large Chinese communities in big cities on the east and west coast. Thus, this was a small-scale pilot study, not enough subjects for any statistical analysis. I collected the data from "semi structured" interviews, which was performed in face-to-face and one-on-one each person for about one hour. In addition, the interviews were held in languages which the interviewees felt most comfortable to use. The languages included Mandarin, Taiwanese, and English.